Letter to AB AG & Health Minister 

We can destroy all the farms in the country, but if we do not recognise that the primary cause of pathogens with pandemic potential is human caused intentional manipulation, described as "biological risks from anthropic sources", pandemics will continue to rage. This is all the more possible given the way that the technology has now been patented to allow the genetic profile of each newly discovered pathogen to be entered into what amounts to not much more than a template for the rapid developments of new mRNA "vaccines" that governments can then be persuaded to purchase on behalf of their populations. This is the business model that many of the vaccine companies who have completely compromised the integrity and independence of any of the drug regulatory bodies and the WHO are now counting on.

Every major pandemic in the last 60 years originated through ‘gain of function’ research, including SARS-CoV-1 & 2.  In fact, 71 instances of "biological risks from anthropic sources” have occurred between 1975 and 2016 alone, with the majority arising out of purposes related to biodefense, bioweapon, bioterrorism or related research, often accidentally released. These range from Anthrax and Ebola to Foot and Mouth disease to the Marburg virus and SARS-CoV-1 originating from places such as Fort Dietrich, the UNC Chapel Hill (both US military bases) and the National Centre for Foreign Animal Disease in Winnipeg as well as in the National Institute of Virology in Beijing and others.

Did any of you notice how Mme Megie referenced the advisor to the World Economic Forum when she introduced the Bill for Second Reading? What we are noting is how major NGOs, with their "philanthropic backing" from industries with conflicts of interests are increasingly preparing "toolkits", "handbooks", "agendas" or other tools to give to legislators who, though well-intended, are then so naive as to not see their own role as facilitators of corporate agendas within governments.  In the open letter to MP Erskine-Smith I point out the similarities between the verbiage and key concepts in 'his' bill, with those in WHO documentation written for government officials with an earlier case - that of a World Economic Forum "Toolkit for Regulators" which may very well have been the impetus for 2019 changes to Health Canada's Drug regulation policies... Some of us are noting a disturbing "corporatist aka fascist" development where BigCorp ends up with more powers to set policy than elected officials do.

 I invite you to review the following items to further build your undersrtanding of the Issues around the WHO, its One Health initative, Canada's HERC, and of course problems with and suggestions for the improvment of Bill C-293.

--> First Briefing Note re: Bill C-293 (Sept 24) https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/csn-press-room-canadians-seek-defeat

--> a 12 Question Quiz on Bill C-293 (How much do you already know about it?) https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/how-would-you-prevent-a-pandemic  - This includes background on Global Health Governance

--> Press Release HERC + Slide Show + Redone version of C-293 (Oct 23) https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/csn-press-room-one-health-vs-gain

--> Open letter to the author of Bill C-293 (Oct 22) https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/bill-c-293-concerns-astroturfed-you 

THIS COULD BE A SEPARATE LETTER

In closing, here are my  comments re: 2 of the journalist questions received at the press conference (in case any of you get asked the same questions elsewhere).

- One journalist asked why NOW? She may not have noted that Canadian agricultural producers had already presented their concerns to the Standing Committee on Health when the Bill was going through the House of Commons. The speakers at this press conference essentially echoed those same concerns. (See one of the meetings 82-84 here https://www.ourcommons.ca/Committees/en/HESA/Meetings or earlier)

- One asked why the AB gov is not spending MORE on promoting the mRNA vaccines. I wished I could have directed that journalist to all the reasons why these products are increasingly understood to be NOT safe, NOT necessary and NOT effective. The journalist seems just as captured by the mainstream line that we all need more of what we were first told was supposed to be 97% effective but which wasn't. Unfortunately, prior to the Injection of Truth event, there was a lot of opposition, even from some of the MLAs on both sides of the ailes. Some publications  being cited come straight from those regulators who only got their fees paid to them IF they approved the products (you would need to find more neutral and less compromised sources.)  Others were based on limited earlly data. Given that the news the shots did not prevent transmission went back to Jan 26 of 2021 (https://totalityofevidence.com/timeline/covid-19-vaccines-wont-stop-infection-or-transmission-of-sars-cov-2/) and has been corroborated many times since, what is AB Health doing to ensure that Albertans are receiving CURRENT evidence-based information? Are you not worried about someone calling you out for being a provider of mis/disinformation with falsehood and half-truths like these: "The mRNA vaccines are proven highly effective in preventing serious illness and death from COVID-19 infection. They are available to individuals aged 6 months of age and older. COVID-19 vaccines use mRNA technology to teach cells how to make a protein to trigger an immune response and make antibodies to fight the COVID-19 virus. It does not alter your DNA." You are linking to statements by Health Canada that are so oversimplified that they cannot be considered true, but rather lies by omission, like this one: "Instead, they teach your cells how to make a protein that will trigger an immune response. Once triggered, your body makes antibodies. These antibodies help you fight the infection if the real virus does enter your body in the future." 

This goes beyond AHS and AB Health. Any other branch of government whose Ministry staff were caught up in the propaganda should be checking if their human resource departments provide assistance, for example to those staff who had to go on medical leave post injection. You should know that the vast majority of these Canadians are not qualifying for Canada's vaccine injury compensation program, and if they do, it is insufficient to sustain a family's livelihood for life. You should all be concerned about the move to grant MAID to vaccine injured people for whom the health care system now has no solutions.Canada's first cases are described here. You as policy makers across the province need to help ensure that the public, including journalists, are shown how to sift out outdated data from very early in the pandemic, where later data now comes to other conclusions.

In the meantime, the testimony to the National Citizens Inquiry by the vaccinologist who had been selected to work on Canada's C-19 vaccine candidate is an absolute MUST SEE for anyone who is still recommending that people promote or even take the C-19 shots. See https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/when-dr-byram-bridle-speaks-  I have shared some of the key slides and provided the temporary link to the testimony. What is shown here is actual data from Pfizer and from government sources, so for anyone to shut their eyes to the information claiming 'misinformation' is simply being disingenuous and intellectually lazy.

I am sure Minister LaGrange has been repeatedly asked to STOP making the COVID shots available and many of us see it unethical for the AB gov to continue offering them. Why should those people who have been prevented from hearing the evidence-based research into the very NEGATIVE risk benefit ratio (more harm than good) be allowed to walk straight into harm's way? These are people who have been nudged and conditioned and propaganized via all manner of techniques. They are NOT PEOPLE making INFORMED choices, given that full information about the risk/benefit balance is STILL NOT BEING MADE available to those giving the injections and to be shared with the public in advance.  If these people were sleepwalking into traffic, we would pull them away to save their lives. The same needs to be done here... remove the harm or pull everyone out of harm's way. 

I posit that the UCP members who are AWARE of the harms are afraid to act on that awareness as they fear those who still are not aware of the harms winning the public perception battle. This only works if the public is also in the dark. Let's start with AB Health and spend the money on information campaigns re: health improvement and evidence-based prevention. For example, start with this:  teach people to see the difference between infodemiology.jmir.org/2022/1/e32452 and https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7826030/ in terms of uncompromised evidence. I suggest it is time for the Opposition to look seriously at the data around vaccine harms and injuries and let the Government side know that they will NOT politicize any move to backtrack on bad policies of the past. We cannot have any MORE vax injured and grieving Albertans, something that will be inevitable the more you delay and the more people get more injections.

Here is a challenge, to those who believe getting these shots is still a good thing (despite all the evidence that the MORE times the body fights off mRNA shots, the LESS the body fights off COVID and other pathogens - see if you can score 8/10 on this quiz  https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/how-up-to-date-is-your-doctors-knowledge!!! If not, you need to have the humility to seek further learning in a rapidly evolving field and to refrain from propoganizing on behalf of BigCorp. Again, blame it on the media if you cannot explain the difference between the actions in the body of "regular" vaccines and mRNA injections i.e. so-called vaccines. This is how I have learned to explain the difference: https://followingthecovidscience.substack.com/p/draft-understanding-the-basic-mechanism

Sincerely,