Control Grid & Global Gov NEWS

THIS is what we all are trying to avoid:

Pre-Covid, to share this would result in people laughing at us, calling us "Conspiracy Theorists". Telling us to "get a life." 

Post-Covid, not so much. ANY ATTEMPT by our government and corporate leaders TO NOT SAFEGUARD our Freedoms to live our lives and speak our minds freely NEEDS TO BE CONSIDERED SUSPECT.

Those who have been conditioned into believing that fencing in human beings behind tech-mediated fences "for everyone's safety" need to be shown the step by step consequences of their actions. ESPECIALLY if they are our elected officials. The biggest barrier currently  is the fear driven, well-intentioned but ill-informed decision makers. They fear the horrors of "climate change", "diviseness in society", "the next pandemic" etc. so much that they quietly acquiese to what is being placed before them, because it "sounds good" and because they heard that other governing bodies down the road are doing this too. See where this is leading us now...

Follow Tech Surveillance and Censorship News here: https://reclaimthenet.org 

A recent article in LifeSiteNews focussed on this aspect of the Bill: Included in Bill C-293 are provisions to 'regulate commercial activities that can contribute to pandemic risk, including industrial animal agriculture,' produce 'alternative proteins,' and 'enable contact tracing of persons.' https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/canadian-pandemic-bill-would-regulate-meat-production-develop-contract-tracing/ 

The Climate vs Population Issue 

Here are quotes from past thinkers with influence: They  see people NOT as free individuals filled with unlimited potetial to build abundant futures for all, but instead as unthinking wasteful users of resources needing to be reigned in...

• Thomas Malthus: father of Malthusianism, (1766–1834) made statments like: "The world's population will multiply more rapidly than the available food supply." "Population, when unchecked, goes on doubling itself every 25 years or increases in a geometrical ratio." "The redundant population, necessarily occasioned by the prevalence of early marriages, must be repressed by occasional famines, and by the custom of exposing children, which, in times of distress, is probably more frequent than is ever acknowledged to Europeans." (Brief Video)

• In his 1968 book The Population Bomb, neo-Malthusian biologist Paul Ehrlich predicted:

The battle to feed humanity is over. In the 1970s the world will undergo famines—hundreds of millions of people are going to starve to death in spite of any crash programs embarked upon now. At this late date nothing can prevent a substantial increase in the world death rate.1. (SOURCE)

• In 1991, when the Soviet Union imploded and the Cold War ended, the Club of Rome published The First Global Revolution, which includes the following: The common enemy of humanity is man. In searching for a new enemy to unite us, we came up with the idea that pollution, the threat of global warming, water shortages, famine and the like would fit the bill. All these dangers are caused by human intervention, and it is only through changed attitudes and behavior that they can be overcome. The real enemy then, is humanity itself.5 [emphasis added] (SOURCE)

• Maurice Strong: In 1997, oil patch businessman turned UN official and environmental leader envisioned a dystopian novel along these lines: “We may get to the point where the only way of saving the world will be for industrialized civilization to collapse.”3 What if a small group of world leaders were to conclude that the principal risk to the Earth comes from the actions of the rich countries? And if the world is to survive, those rich countries would have to sign an agreement reducing their impact on the environment. Will they do it? The group’s conclusion is ‘no’. The rich countries won’t do it. They won’t change. So, in order to save the planet, the group decides: Isn’t the only hope for the planet that the industrialized civilizations collapse? Isn’t it our responsibility to bring that about? 4 [emphasis added] (SOURCE)

• In 2015, the UN created a set of 17 “Sustainable Development Goals".They have been described as "a set of utopian (ie. fanciful and unrealistic) premises that they wish to impose on all nations, in order to steer the planet towards their twisted version of a better future. But, for whom will this future actually be “better”? At first read, each of the goals appears to be a very desirable and universal hope that people share. However, the devil is in the details, as always. These vague, seemingly benign statements are meant to lull the populace into a state of inattention and trust." For closer scrutiny, see: https://preventgenocide2030.org/all-things-un/ 

• Auguso Lopez Claros: Executive Director of the Global Governance Forum speking in 2024: “We move on towards a potentially catastrophic future of accelerating climate change, the continued unravelling of our nuclear order, rising and destructive nationalisms, and an economic paradigm that no longer delivers prosperity for all in a way that does not create social divisions and does not undermine the foundations of democracy. [Our current] system of international cooperation is no longer fit for purpose; it struggles to cope with the multiple unresolved crises that we face, often because it lacks the appropriate jurisdiction.” (link)

THIS TYPE OF MESSAGING, along with more and more societal divisiveness being stoked by those with the means to do so, is setting the stage for the emergence of GLOBAL GOVERNANCE.

The subtext is: problems are too complex, local governments are too incapable, let us, the Global Governmance professionals, do the job of governing as long as you don't rise up against us!!!

When looking at how fears of climate change drive many of the policies being implemented via censorship by globalist organizations of evidence-based, counter-narrative climate science, we can see that: 

the supposed “battle” against “climate change” is a cover for the anti-growth, anti-industrialization, neo-Malthusian and ultimately Marxist agenda of Canadian Maurice Strong and his followers; “global warming” and “environmental collapse” are not existential threats to humankind. As Bjorn Lomborg (the Skeptical Environmentalist) constantly points out, we have all the technological tools we need to cope with environmental problems and “climate change,” if we don’t cut our own throats by trying to quickly eliminate fossil fuels. (SOURCE)