LATEST DEVELOPMENTS

Most recent up top. To follow this story from where we started posting, scroll to the bottom and move up.

July 2, 2024 (originally posted June 28) James Roguski states: "NOW is the time to reinvigorate our opposition to Big Pharma’s control over the WHO and over our own governments"  and reminds readers of the upcoming meeting to continue work on the Pandemic Treaty from July 16-17 stating: "On Saturday June 1, 2024, the 77th World Health Assembly DID adopt amendments to the International Health Regulations and they also agreed to extend the negotiations of a new “Pandemic Agreement” for at least one full year while leaving open the option of holding a special session of the World Health Assembly if consensus can be reached on the proposed “Pandemic Agreement” before the end of 2024." Rogulski share the concern about the ammendments to the International Health Regulations that were passed: "The solution that was agreed upon was to create a “Coordinating Financial Mechanism” to facilitate a massive transfer of wealth in order to build manufacturing and distribution capacity on a geographically distributed basis. Articles 13, 44, 44bis and 54bis set the groundwork for a scheme to transfer an unlimited amount of financial resources without defining the details regarding where the money would be coming from, to whom it will be given or what the priorities are to be. The amendments also completely fail to set up any type of requirements for auditing this massive wealth transfer which will enable massive conflicts of interest and corruption." See his full post: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/what-really-happened-at-the-who 

July 2, 2024 (originally posted June 28) The author of the "Interest of Justice" substack reminds readers that work on the WHO Pandemic Treaty is set to resume soon - it didn't pass at the WHA, but behind the scenes committees will soon get back to work with a May 2025 target date for completion. IOJ shares: " Tenth meeting of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body (INB) for a WHO instrument on pandemic prevention, preparedness and response 16 – 17 July 2024  The meeting will consider and agree on the INB’s workplan and meeting schedule and, as appropriate, updates to the INB’s method of work, ...the opening and closing plenary sessions of the INB will be open to WHO Member States, Associate Members, Observers and regional economic integration organizations, as well all relevant stakeholders. It is anticipated that the open sessions will be publicly webcast and archived for later viewing." IOJ had previously launched court action when it became clear that some stakeholders like GAVI, World Bank and Amnesty International, are allowed access while dissenting voices like Interest of Justice are not.

IOJ also writes: The “Pandemic Agreement” seeks to incentivize and reward the search for pathogens with pandemic potential by setting up a WHO Coordinated Laboratory Network to submit genetic information to the Pathogen Access and Benefit Sharing (PABS) System, leading to the development of highly profitable products to be provided through the WHO Global Distribution and Logistics Network.

Of great concern is the fact that the “Pandemic Agreement” is structured to be a framework convention, much like the Framework Convention On Climate Change. Adoption of such a framework convention would set up an ongoing Conference of the Parties that would meet on a yearly basis to adopt protocols in a manner that would occur largely without public input and outside of public scrutiny. The planned expenditures would be obligatory and could wind up costing countries enormous funding for experimental interventions and censorship that should be prevented, and the funding could go to much better things than the treaty would mandate in our opinion." See the full post here: https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/yikes-who-pandemic-treaty-set-for

June 21 (originally posted June 4) The US based Sovereignty Coalition put out a press release in which they summarize the major concerns about the handling and content of the IHR Amendments at the WHA just days prior. They also outline their recommendations for US lawy makers moving forward. https://sovereigntycoalition.org/release-reject-the-w-h-o-s-illegal-power-grab-tedros-violates-his-organizations-constitution-in-order-to-threaten-ours/ 

June 21 (originally posted June 11) A Dutch article gives details on the  “global health emergency workforce” – an international corps of “health workers” who can be deployed to “combat pandemics."  https://dailyclout.io/who-treaty-smuggles-in-bill-gates-plan-for-a-fire-department-for-pandemics/ 

June 19 Canadian journalist Chris George writes about the ties between the world's largest corporate lobby group (the World Economic Forum) and the parent organization of the WHO (the United Nations.) https://bygeorgejournal.substack.com/p/wefs-powerplay-partnership-with-the 

June 18 James Rogulski reminds everyone: We LOST the first round of this fight. 

The amendments to the International Health Regulations were adopted on June 1, 2024 and the nations actually got far more than they originally requested. He urges that we keep Pandemic Preparedness on the forefront of our politicians' minds and that "THE SECOND ROUND OF THIS BATTLE HAS BEGUN!" 

He links to a number of recent interviews here: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/wtfu 

June 15 Dr. Meryl Nass updates readers on what stayed and what was removed in the version of the International Health Regulations agreed to on June 1. https://merylnass.substack.com/p/complete-article-by-article-analysis (She reminds os that the version of the IHR that is in force currently is the (2005) version and the ammendments can't go into place for 12 months. However, according to James Rogulski, we still need to lobby the government NOT to ratify these amendments. 

June 14 Rebel News journalist Tamara Ugolini reported that PHAC has a Pandemic Instrument Team which is "dedicated to negotiations that will strengthen the World Health Organization mandate and orchestrate unified response plans".   In her article, Tamara Ugolini links to the same formum (March 2023) that we referenced on this site (under BREAKING NEWS --> HELLO GOVERNMENT) https://www.canada.ca/en/public-health/services/emergency-preparedness-response/canada-role-international-pandemic-instrument/engagement-forum.html  https://www.rebelnews.com/health_canada_s_pandemic_instrument_team_gives_an_update_on_who_pandemic_negotiations 

June 12 Canada's Bill 293 The Pandemic Preparedness Bill has passed 3rd reading in the House of Commons and 1st reading in the Senate. This model letter to Members of the Social Affairs, Science and Technology Committee has been posted here for Canadians to consider modifying and sending.

https://canadianshareablenews.substack.com/p/when-mps-and-senators-try-to-prepare 

June 5 Canadian journalist Chris George did an EXCELLENT job of reflecting back on many issues around the WHA meeting Gevena. His list of unsanswered questions as to the actions of the Canadian contingent in Geneva can guide a lot of future letterwriting to come. See https://bygeorgejournal.substack.com/p/the-who-presses-forward-to-establish For example: 

The Trudeau government should report out on the Canadian delegation’s work at the WHA. Canadians deserve to know what Tam and the delegates from PHAC and Health Canada committed to with the WHO....

And my own question is: Will Canadians get an official account of Canada’s participation in the Geneva meetings and the commitments made to the ongoing work and future objectives of the WHO?

Here’s a parting thought: given that unelected delegates agreed to a set of regulations and the WHO member states did not sign a treaty, it suggests that whatever the WHO’s claim of the legitimacy of the new IHR document is, it still must be approved by member states. In Canada, parliamentarians have not debated the issues surrounding approving the WHO agenda. Our elected representatives have not ratified anything as of yet. There is an onus on all of us, if we are concerned about the WHO, to contact our MP, and contact the PM, Health Minister, as well as those Conservative MPs who will most likely be forming government later next year. 

In what appears to be the Trudeau government’s deliberate cone of silence, we must initiate the discussion. The WHO’s power play to establish its global authority must not go unchallenged.

June 3 (posted here on June 5) South African lawyer Shabnam Palesa Mohamed shared this: 

Nothing was accepted. The WHO is acting as if they all agreed, and will later try to try to change the amendments. “They are trying to deceive humanity”.

“Negotiations ended without agreement through pressure and threats of sanctions, trade restrictions and being maligned by international media.

“Countries which intervened immediately after the adoption disassociated themselves from the IHR 2005 amendments”. So there was more than one.

“Member states are being pressured and threatened. Nation states said they would not bow to pressure”. Some delegates left the WHA 77 early in protest.

See more here: https://jamesroguski.substack.com/cp/145298270 (including the report for Japan that only 37 nations voted FOR the final IHR) 

June 2 (posted here June 4) The author of Geneva Health Files reported the ratification of the IHR ammendments just before the deadline as a major win. It appears Prithi Patnaik relies on reports from national delegates in her reports. So it is of interest to note what they see as postive results - "recognition of equity as a principle in this instrument for the first time in its history; defines a pandemic emergency; include obligations on the access to health products; establishes a new coordinated financing mechanism, among other elements including strengthening transparency and timeliness of information." As well, there is the extension of the mandate of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Body for another year to allow them to have more time to work on the Pandemic Agreement, etc. (See https://genevahealthfiles.substack.com/p/adopted-wha77-ihr-amendments-inb-2024-bloomfield) 

June 3  Dr. Meryl Nass posted the version of the IHR that was passed in which she bolded the new additions. For Canada the amendments would go into effect in 1 year, on June 1, 2025 unless our government reserves or rejects them within 10 months. Canada had long signed on to the original IHR. You can download the document from here: https://merylnass.substack.com/p/the-ihr-as-amended-yesterday-is-benign Note: Each State Party shall designate or establish, in accordance with its national law and context, one or two entities to serve as National IHR Authority and a National IHR Focal Point, and as well as the authorities responsible within its respective jurisdiction for the implementation of health measures under these Regulations. The National IHR Authority shall coordinate the implementation of these Regulations within the jurisdiction of the State Party.

Questions for the representatives who attended on our behalf would be: "What are your plans here in Canada to set up entities that serve as National IHR Authorities? Did we have such a place all along (called National IHR Focal Point)? Was it Health Canada?"

While Dr. Meryl Nass feels that many "odious" proposals did not get passed, James Rogulski believes that between what did pass and what was already in the agreement, the future still looks worrisome. His list was posted here on June 1. https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/the-amendments-to-the-ihr-have-been 

Dr. Robert Malone also is worried. He wrote: There was no actual vote to confirm and approve these amendments. According to the WHO, this was achieved by “consensus” among this unelected insider conclave rather than a vote; “Countries agreed by consensus to amend the International Health Regulations, which were last changed in 2005, such as by defining the term “pandemic emergency” and helping developing countries to gain better access to financing and medical products”, a WHO statement reported, continuing that “countries” agreed to complete negotiations on the pandemic accord with the year, “at the latest”.  Representatives from many WHO member nation-states were not in the room, and the ones that were there were encouraged to keep quiet. After the non-vote, there was giddy celebration of this achievement, clearly demonstrating the lack of somber maturity, commitment to both rules and careful diplomatic consensus, and absence of serious intent and purpose warranted by the topic. This was clearly an insider clique acting unilaterally to circumvent normal process, and mirrors a similar process used to confirm the re-appointment of Tedros to the Director-General position. See his full post here: https://rwmalonemd.substack.com/p/who-international-health-regulations

June 1 (added here June 2) large citizen rallies to protest the WHO's overreach into national health care policies the planned focus on corporate vaccine-driven global policy took place in Geneva https://crisis24.garda.com/alerts/2024/05/switzerland-activists-to-hold-protest-march-in-geneva-june-1;  in Japan https://www.arabnews.jp/en/japan/article_123159/ 

June 1 (added here June 2) The Costa Rican delegate to the WHO (the country's vice-minister of health) broke consensus with the other nations: “That’s why Costa Rica disassociates from the consensus to extend the mandate because the prolongation and the uncertainty of a potential pandemic treaty will only serve to worsen the existing polarization which directly affects the well being of my population” https://interestofjustice.substack.com/p/bombshell-costa-rica-boldly-rejects 

June 1 - James Roguski testified to the National Citizens Inquiry on the current status in Geneva.  See: https://rumble.com/v4yvzz9-regina-hearings-day-3.html (Scroll to the 10 hour 63 minute mark to hear him, speaking just 5 hours after the vote on some of the ammendments to the International Health Reglations passed.) 

June 1, 2024 - shared by Dr. Meryl Nass:

The barely changed IHRs were just adopted. Don't worry -- the changes are practically meaningless

The diplomats in Geneva have been called back for another Plenary meeting to approve a new version of the IHR amendments dated TODAY june 1, 2024:

https://apps.who.int/gb/ebwha/pdf_files/WHA77/A77_ACONF14-en.pdf…

I am pleased to report that while I had only a short time to read this, the document looks basically like what I have predicted all week. It is a “vanilla” version from which all terrible items have been removed, with one exception and one partial exception. 

The one odious item is the agreement to “address” misinformation and disinformation. But as I explained earlier, this is already being implemented by our nations, so it is not new.

The section that demanded digital health documents aka digital IDs is gone; now both paper or digital health documents can be acceptable during a declared pandemic. The detailed demands to prove the “authenticity” of such documents has been watered down to the need for a doctor to sign the document.

I continue to think this is a huge win and this IHR document gives the globalists nothing that they really wanted. It also gives the developing nations essentially nothing. In other words, nearly two years of negotiations led to nothing.

Costa Rica does not want to keep negotiating. Slovakia just rejected the entire new IHR! Iran warns it may reject parts of the IHR.

May 31, 2024 - James Roguski looks ahead, IHR ammendments artlce 24, 27, 31, Annex 6 appear to have reached agreement - articles on "vaccine passports"; international travellers will need to abide by authority of the nation (compel travellers to underto isolation, quarantine, prophylactics/vaccine). Empowering national authorities to overrule the freedoms of travellers; authorizing jabs for enforcement. Also how guardians can sign paperwork to give informed consent on your behalf. If you push back, officials can "assign a GUARDIAN" for you to be forced to undergo xyz protocol. https://rumble.com/v4yizgt-who-status-update-with-james-roguski-noor-bin-ladin-calls...-s02e10.html  There appears to be NO ONE single person at the WHA who is speaking up to point out the harms failed vaccine projects/biological weapons. The whole concept of these products having primacy over other means of prevention is ingrained into the mindset of the attendees. Also comments on the shortening of the time frame for ammendments back in May 2022. That was not properly voted on. Iran, Netherlands, Slovakia, New Zealand have declared the 2022 invalid. Other nations will only have 10 months... no evidence that the vote was properly carried out. No proper roll call being taken even now. Can't claim victory till the WHO is disbanded!

May 30, 2024 - James Roguski shares the agenda of the final days at the WHA https://jamesroguski.substack.com/p/final-countdown